Quality and outcomes of synchronous two-team Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: Revisiting a variant technique.

Related Articles

Quality and outcomes of synchronous two-team Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: Revisiting a variant technique.

J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;114(6):719-724

Authors: Hummel R, Mees ST, Smith L, Jamieson GG, Kiroff G, Shenfine J

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 1975, a modification of popular two-stage Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy was published with synchronous resection in chest and abdomen. As data on this technique are rare and inconsistent, we aimed to investigate safety, feasibility, and outcome of this approach.
METHODS: Outcome of 201 patients undergoing synchronous oesophagectomy from 2000 to 2013 was analysed retrospectively. Two groups (early: 2000-2006; late: 2007-2013) were analysed to allow comparison of outcome over time.
RESULTS: Patients in the later period had fewer respiratory comorbidities (P = 0.010), median blood loss decreased significantly over time while lymph node yield increased (P < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 58.9 (early) versus 51.7% (late) of patients (P = 0.320), anastomotic leaks in 14.3 versus 6.7% (P = 0.112), respiratory complications in 48.2 versus 34.8% (P = 0.063). Thirty-day/90-day mortality was 2.7% versus 3.4, respectively, 8.1% versus 6.8% (P ≤ 0.793). Long-term survival was better in the later cohort (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data of 201 patients over a period of 14 years suggests that this technique is a quick, feasible, safe, and reasonable alternative to standard two-stage Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. Quality of this approach and ultimate outcomes have improved over time, with similar complication rates/outcomes to literature accepted standards for two-stage approach, especially in the later time period. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:719-724. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PMID: 27792238 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://ift.tt/2leWbcw