Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Κυριακή 11 Ιουλίου 2021

Surgical management of the orbit in thyroid eye disease: lateral orbital decompression

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review Lateral orbital wall decompression is one of many well established techniques available to surgeons in management of patients with clinically significant thyroid eye disease (TED). Several different surgical approaches have been described in the literature and are reviewed herein. Recent findings Lateral orbital wall decompression remains a popular technique for surgical management of TED, with a recent American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery survey showing that 22.6% of respondents preferred a single-wall procedure, with 36.8% of that subset preferring lateral wall decompression alone. Surgical techniques for lateral orbital wall decompression differ based on several steps, such as the incisional approach, whether to take an ab-interno versus ab-externo approach, and whether to remove orbital fat to achieve further decompression. In addition, technological advances have produced an array of tools available to the orbital surgeon to achieve efficient and accurate bone removal. Summary Lateral orbital wall decompression for TED, despite being an older technique, remains a popular and well established procedure for orbital decompression. Though no randomized controlled clinical trial supports one decompression technique over another for TED, lateral orbital wall decompression offers many benefits such as its ease of access and visualization of the orbital space.
View on the web

The history of nasal reconstruction

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review Total nasal reconstruction is a unique plastic surgery challenge of the highest order. The history of nasal reconstruction dates back to ancient times and it remains a fundamental challenge today. This article reviews the historical context of nasal reconstruction, and highlights how the essential tenets of this art have been conserved over millennia. Recent findings The disfiguring and brutal practice of nasal amputation created a demand for 'nosemakers' in India since 1500 BC. In 600 BC, Sushruta described the use of a leaf to make a template of the wound, and a cheek flap to supply tissue. In the 1400–1500s, the Italians relied on similar flap concepts, but employed a pedicled arm flap for soft tissue coverage. Eventually, the forehead flap, or 'Indian method' of nasal reconstruction, made its way to Europe in the 1800s. Its use has been a fundamental component of nasal reconstruction to this day. Summary Knowledge of the unique history of nasal reconstruction permits appreciation of this surgical integration of art and science. The story of nasal reconstruction has been one of global contribution and creativity that has stood the test of time.
View on the web

Management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review Provide an up to date review of the diagnosis, workup and treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). DFSP can be a challenging disease to manage and adequate understanding of the most up to date literature can help provide comprehensive treatment strategies. Recent findings DFSP is an infiltrative cutaneous sarcoma. It tends to have deep local invasion with a high risk of local recurrence, but a low risk of distant metastasis. It presents typically as a slow growing, asymptomatic skin lesion. It presents rarely in the head and neck, only 15% of the time. Recent data has discussed the role of wide local excision (WLE) vs. Mohs surgery. In addition, for unresectable disease the role of systemic therapy and immunomodulatory agents such as Imatinib has shown success. Summary Typically, surgical management is the first line for DFSP, however the risk for local recurrence still remains high with negative margins. Due to this risk, lifelong surveillance is required after initial diagnosis and management. Similar to other head and neck tumors, most recurrences happen within the first 3 years after treatment. DFSP can be treated with WLE or Mohs. For aggressive disease that is considered unresectable systemic therapy does exist, including molecular targeted therapies.
View on the web

Seeing through the evidence for corneal neurotization

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review Trigeminal anesthesia causes neurotrophic keratopathy, which may yield facial disfigurement and corneal blindness. Recent findings We summarize approaches and evidence for corneal neurotization. Summary Regional sensory nerve transfer appears safe and effective for therapeutic management of neurotrophic keratopathy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm the utility of corneal neurotization.
View on the web

Prevention and management of oronasal fistulas

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review The aim of this article is to present the current opinion on the prevention and management of oronasal fistulas in cleft palate patients. Recent findings Though cleft palate repair has seen numerous modifications and improvements, oronasal fistulas remain one of the most common complications of palatoplasty. There are various techniques available for preventing and managing this complication. Summary Oronasal fistulas can be minimized by employing proper principles for palatoplasty. Once a fistula occurs, the repair technique should be appropriate for the fistula type. Oronasal fistula classifications, various repair techniques, tissue adjuncts, and biomaterials used in both the primary palate repair and oronasal fistula repair are discussed in this review.
View on the web

Subdorsal Z-flap: a modification of the Cottle technique in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review To present the novel technique of subdorsal Z-flap in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and give an overview on current available dorsal preservation techniques in the literature. Recent findings The subdorsal Z-flap combines the advantages of the high and low septal strip techniques in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and ensures well tolerated treatment of the dorsal hump and structural stability. Summary The technique and concept of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty (DPR) has been used for more than a century but only recently gained significant popularity along with specific technical refinements. The advantage of DPR lies in the preservation of the delicate triangular cartilaginous unity of the septal and upper lateral cartilages with its functional and esthetic implications in contrast to all resecting techniques. A variety of modifications of DPR have been published in recent years, each with advantages and disadvantages. The issue of hump recurrence remains a major concern in DPR. We describe the 'subdorsal Z-flap' and related techniques of DPR in detail, present two clinical case studies and discuss alternative technical modifications. The 'subdorsal Z -flap' combines the advantages of the high septal strip procedure with the advantages of the traditional 'low septal strip' or Cottle technique. By starting the incision at a high level, final septal height can be adjus ted precisely. By creating a triangular shape with a vertical cut below the K-Area, which is usually the highest point of the hump, significant leverage can be applied from below the hump and the septal overlap may be sutured securely for a stable correction. In combination with Piezo osteotomy and full open approach, great precision and predictability can be achieved. In a recent publication, we presented more than 100 consecutive cases of subdorsal Z-flap DPR with good functional and esthetic outcomes. The subdorsal Z-flap modification is a combination of two popular DPR techniques, fusing their advantages while minimizing risk profile. A slightly higher degree of technical difficulty and necessary tissue dissection provides the benefits of better predictability and reduction of adverse outcomes.
View on the web

Postoperative pain management in pediatric cleft lip and palate repair

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePurpose of review There has been an increased interest in the literature on methods to improve perioperative outcomes in surgical patients while minimizing opioid use. Pediatric cleft palate repair can be a painful procedure, and this postoperative pain can lead to longer hospital stays and worse surgical outcomes. Recent findings Recent literature has explored four key areas surrounding analgesia after cleft lip and palate repair. These areas are management of postoperative pain with nonopioid oral analgesics, peripheral nerve blockade, liposomal bupivacaine for donor-site analgesia in bone grafting, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Summary The included studies indicate that patients undergoing palatoplasty may have a decreased opioid requirement if nonopioid analgesics such as acetaminophen and ibuprofen are started early in the postoperative setting. Peripheral nerve blockade is an important adjunct to analgesia in these patients. Suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blockade may improve pain management over traditional infraorbital nerve blockade. In patients undergoing alveolar bone grafting, injection of liposomal bupivacaine into the donor site can significantly decrease oral opioid requirements. Finally, ERAS protocols are emerging ways to decrease postoperative pain in cleft palate patients.
View on the web

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου