Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Σάββατο 22 Απριλίου 2017

Agreement Between Renal Prescribing References and Determination of Prescribing Appropriateness in Hospitalised Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Agreement Between Renal Prescribing References and Determination of Prescribing Appropriateness in Hospitalised Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

QJM. 2017 Apr 18;:

Authors: O'Shaughnessy M, Allen N, O'Regan J, Payne-Danson E, Mentre L, Davin D, Lavin P, Grimes T

Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for adverse drug events. The clinical significance of discordance between renal prescribing references is unknown.
Aim: We determined the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in CKD, measured agreement between two prescribing references, and assessed potential for harm consequent to PIP.
Design: Single-centre observational study.
Methods: A random sample of hospitalised patients with CKD were grouped according to baseline CKD stage (3, 4, or 5). Prescriptions requiring caution in CKD were referenced against the Renal Drug Handbook (RDH) and British National Formulary (BNF) to identify PIP (non-compliance with recommendations). Inter-reference agreement was measured using percentage agreement and Kappa coefficient. Potential for harm consequent to PIP was assessed by physicians and pharmacists using a validated scale. One-year mortality was compared between patients with or without PIP during admission.
Results: Among 119 patients (median age 73 years, 50% male), 136 cases of PIP were identified in 78 (65.5%) patients. PIP prevalence, per patient, was 64.7% using the BNF and 28.6% using the RDH (fair agreement, Kappa 0.33, p < 0.001). The majority (63.2%) of PIP cases detected exclusively by the BNF carried minimal or no potential for harm. PIP was not significantly associated with one-year mortality (34.7% versus 21.1%, p = 0.14).
Conclusions: PIP was common in hospitalised patients with CKD. Substantial discordance between renal prescribing references was apparent. The development of universally-adopted, evidence-based, prescribing guidelines for CKD might optimise medications safety in this vulnerable group.

PMID: 28431157 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



http://ift.tt/2pOwkbm

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου