Postoperative radiotherapy for lung cancer: Is it worth the controversy?

Postoperative radiotherapy for lung cancer: Is it worth the controversy?

Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Oct 14;51:10-18

Authors: Billiet C, Peeters S, Decaluwé H, Vansteenkiste J, Mebis J, Ruysscher D

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pathologically involved mediastinal lymph nodes (N2) remains unclear. Despite a reduction of local recurrence (LR), its effect on overall survival (OS) remains unproven. Therefore we conducted a review of the current literature.
METHODS: To investigate the benefit and safety of modern PORT, we identified published phase III trials for PORT. We investigated modern PORT in low-risk (ypN0/1 and R0) and high-risk (ypN2 and/or R1/2) patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy and resection.
RESULTS: Seventeen phase III trials using PORT were selected. Of all PORT N2 studies, 4 were eligible for evaluation of LR, all in high-risk patients only. In these high-risk patients receiving PORT, the mean LR rate at 5years was 20.9% (95% CI 16-24). Two trials were suitable to assess LR rates after chemotherapy and surgery without PORT. In these low-risk patients, the mean 5-year LR was 33.1% (95% CI 27-39). No significant difference in non-cancer deaths between PORT vs. non-PORT patients was observed in N2 NSCLC.
CONCLUSION: PORT is worth the controversy because data illustrate that PORT may increase the OS. However, prospective randomized trials are needed to verify this.

PMID: 27788387 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://ift.tt/2fmjXRG