Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Κυριακή 9 Μαΐου 2021

Predicting survival in head and neck cancer: External validation and update of the prognostic model OncologIQ in 2189 patients

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

Disclosing prognostic information is necessary to enable patients to make well‐informed treatment decisions. OncologIQ is a prognostic model that predicts the overall survival (OS) probability in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to externally validate and update the model with new prognostic factors and translate it to a clinically useful tool.

Methods

A consecutive retrospective sample of 2189 patients eligible for curative treatment of a primary HNSCC were selected. Discriminative performance was determined using the C‐statistic.

Results

External validation showed systematic underestimation of OS in the new population, and reasonable discrimination (C‐statistic 0.67). Adding smoking, pack years, BMI, weight loss, WHO performance, socioeconomic status, and p16 positivity to the recalibrated multivariable model, improved the internally validated C‐statistic to 0.71. The model showed minor optimism and was translated in an online tool (www.oncologiq.nl).

Conclusions

The updated model enables personalized patient counseling during treatment decision consultations.

View on the web

Maxillectomy defects: Virtually comparing fibular and scapular free flap reconstructions

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

This study virtually compares patient‐specific fibular and scapular reconstructions for maxillectomies.

Methods

Nine maxillectomy defects were created on 10 maxillas and virtually reconstructed with patient‐specific fibulas and scapulas. Reconstructions were compared for restoring midface cephalometrics, dental implantability, and pedicle length.

Results

Of 90 maxillectomy defects, the vertically oriented scapula provided improved orbital floor and maxillary height reconstructions (p < 0.001), albeit at the cost of dental implantability compared to the fibula (p < 0.001). In two defects crossing the midline, the fibula, allowing for more osteotomies, provided improved maxillary projection. In the remaining three defects crossing the midline, the horizontally oriented scapula was comparable to the fibula. Fibular and scapular reconstructions were amenable for dental implantation and had similar pedicle lengths, although favoring scapula in extensive defects.

Conclusion

Fibular and scapular reconstructions of maxillectomy defects provide unique strengths. This virtual analysis can guide a goal‐oriented reconstruction based on defect type and patient‐specific goals.

View on the web

Impact of anatomic site of distant metastasis on survival in salivary gland cancers

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

As exemplified in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), metastatic salivary gland cancers display heterogenous behavior. Although anatomic site of metastasis has been suggested to be prognostic for survival in this population, this is not adequately characterized in the current literature.

Methods

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with newly diagnosed metastatic salivary gland cancers with distant metastasis to a single organ were identified.

Results

Eight hundred and fifty‐eight patients (n = 284 bone‐only, n = 322 lung‐only, n = 252 other‐site‐only) were identified. Anatomic site of distant metastasis was not associated with survival in the cohort as a whole; however, on pre‐planned subgroup analysis, lung‐only metastasis, relative to bone‐only metastasis, was the only factor associated with improved survival in patients with ACC (HR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.30–0.93, p = 0.029).

Conclusions

Anatomic site of metastasis is strongly associated with survival in patients with metastatic ACC and should be considered in future studies aiming to optimize therapy in this population.

View on the web

Sarcoid-like reaction in a BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic melanoma patient during treatment with BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageTreatment with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is widely accepted as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced BRAF V600E mutant melanoma. It is generally well-tolerated and has limited side-effects. However, we report a case of a sarcoid-like syndrome induced by treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) in a patient with stage IV-M1d melanoma. Sarcoid-like syndrome is a known side-effect of immune checkpoint-inhibition therapy but has only rarely been described in BRAF/MEK inhibition. However, recognizing this side-effect is important because of potential misinterpretation as progressive disease and influence on treatment. We describe a 48-year-old female patient who initially presented with solitary brain metastasis and diffuse lung lesions. She was treated with D/T to which she had an initial response in all lesions. One year later, new hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies were detected. Imaging was suggestive of the sarcoid-like syndrome. An endoscopic biopsy of the enlarged lymph node showed no melanoma cells. Treatment was continued. Three months later, the patient experienced a drop in hemoglobin, which prompted further investigations into possible occult intestinal metastasis. Video capsule examination revealed a metastatic lesion in the small intestine. A treatment switch to the combination of checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab successfully treated both lung and small intestine lesions. After the third dose of this combination therapy, she developed an immune-related pneumonitis. Treatment with corticosteroids resolved the pneumonitis and decr eased metabolism in the sarcoid-like syndrome. The treatment was not restarted afterward. She remains free of the disease up to today, 2.5 years after diagnosis.
View on the web

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after high-grade immune related adverse events in patients with advanced melanoma

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageTwenty to sixty percent of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) experience high-grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which may prevent the continuation of treatment. Limited clinical evidence is available to guide treatment for these patients. Patients with stage IV or unresectable stage III melanoma at NYU Langone Health were reviewed from 1 January 2014 to 1 July 2019. Patients with first-line ICI systemic therapy, a high-grade irAE and a rechallenge with ICI therapy were included. Postrechallenge irAE recurrence, response rate, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Postrechallenge irAEs recurred in 71.9% (n = 23/32) of patients at a median of 5.1 weeks from rechallenge, with 46.9% (15/32) recurring as high-grade events. Clinical response was achieved in 46.9% (15/32) of patients, including 40.6% (13/32) with a complete response and 6.3% (2/32) with partial response. Median OS from first ICI initiation was 85.4 weeks (45.7–140.7; 25th—75th percentile) and median PFS was 42.9 weeks (29.2–114.2; 25th–75th percentile). Patients with a shorter time to initial irAE and shorter time to postrechallenge irAE were at greater risk for disease progression [hazard ratio 7.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.91–32.83; P = 0.004; hazard ratio 7.45, 95% CI, 1.57–35.35; P = 0.012). Those with greater duration to rechallenge (>10 weeks) were at lower risk for disease progression (hazard ratio 0.15, 0.03–0.68; P = 0.015). ICI rechallenge can be considered in patients with advanced melanoma, as the risk-ben efit profile appears favorable. Treatment toxicity should be appropriately managed, as longer durations to rechallenge may lower the risk of disease progression.
View on the web

Melanoma-specific expression of the tumor suppressor proteins p16 and PTEN is a favorable prognostic factor in established melanoma brain metastases

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imagePTEN and p16 frequently undergo (epi)genetic aberrations in melanoma resulting in decreased, or absent, protein levels. We investigated the prognostic significance of these tumor suppressor genes in melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on archived tissue sections from craniotomies. Expression of PTEN and p16 was semiquantitatively scored (0–3 scale) in melanoma cells, glia, TILs, and endothelial cells of tumor-associated vessels and was compared among the different brain tumor cell compartments. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed according to PTEN and p16 prot ein expression in melanoma cells. 58 patients (median age 56, 37 male) underwent craniotomy for MBMs before February 2014. The OS of patients with decreased, or absent, protein expression (0, 1+) of PTEN and p16 in melanoma cells was significantly shorter compared to that of patients with high (2+, 3+) expression (median OS 2.40 vs. 10.75 months and 4.1 vs. 8.1 months, respectively; Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test P = 0.026 and P = 0.037, respectively). PTEN and p16 protein expression were significantly lower in TILs compared to melanoma cells (Mann–Whitney test P = 0.023 and P 
View on the web

Treatment of in-transit melanoma metastases using intralesional PV-10

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageMelanoma in-transit metastases (ITMs) can sometimes be difficult to manage by surgical excision due to their number, size or location. Treatment by intralesional injection of PV-10, a 10% solution of rose bengal, has been reported to be a simple, safe and effective alternative, but more outcome data are required to confirm its value in the management of ITMs. Two hundred and twenty-six melanoma ITMs in 48 patients were treated with intralesional PV-10 supplied under a special-access scheme. By 8 weeks a complete response in all injected ITMs was achieved in 22 patients (46%) and a partial response in 19 patients (40%). Of 19 patients who had uninjected metastases, 3 (16%) had a response in these. The most common adverse event was transient localised pain in injected tumours. New ITMs developed in 25 patients within 8 weeks, and later in another 8 patients. Repeat injection cycles were given to 21 patients: 13 of these received repeat injection into partially responding or nonresponding tumours, 5 had new ITMs, as well as partially-responding lesions injected, and 3 received injection into new ITMs only. Twenty-two patients received subsequent systemic therapy. At 1 year 37 of the 48 patients were alive, 28 with melanoma, and at 2 years 27 were alive, and 19 with melanoma. Injection of PV-10 was simple and safe and resulted in tumour involution in most patients and sometimes in noninjected tumours. However, many patients developed new lesions; these were treated by further PV-10 injections or with alternative therapies.
View on the web

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου