Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Τετάρτη 23 Ιουνίου 2021

Dysphagia Severity and Outcomes Following Iatrogenic High Vagal Nerve Injury

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

pubmed-meta-image.png

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 Jun 22:34894211026991. doi: 10.1177/00034894211026991. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine severity of dysphagia and outcomes following iatrogenic high vagal nerve injury.

METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients with iatrogenic high vagal nerve injury that were seen at a tertiary referral center from 2012 to 2020.

RESULTS: Of 1304 patients who met criteria for initial screening, 18 met all inclusion cri teria. All 18 required intervention to address postoperative dysphagia. Eleven required enteral feeding tubes with 7 eventually able to advance to exclusively per oral diets. Fourteen underwent vocal fold injection and 6 underwent laryngeal framework surgery. Sixteen pursued swallowing therapy with speech language pathology. Patients lost a mean of 8.6 kg of weight in the 6 months following the injury. Swallowing function on the Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was 4.4 and 2.4 respectively immediately following the injury and improved to 1.9 and 5.3 at the last follow-up. No patients had complete return of normal swallowing function at last follow up.

CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic high vagal injury causes significant lasting dysphagia which improves with intervention but does not completely resolve. Interventions such as vocal fold injection, medialization laryngoplasty, cricopharyngeal myotomy, or swallowing therapy may be required t o reestablish safe swallowing in these patients.

PMID:34157900 | DOI:10.1177/00034894211026991

View on the web

Does Medical School Geography and Ranking Influence Residency Match in Otolaryngology?

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

pubmed-meta-image.png

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 Jun 22:34894211026482. doi: 10.1177/00034894211026482. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the associations between geographic locations, rankings, and size/funding of medical schools and residency programs among the current otolaryngology residents.

METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study queried otolaryngology residency program websites for relevant publicly accessible information. Location was categorized as Midwest, Northeast, South, and West. Ranking was according to Doximity (residency) and US News and World Report (medical school). Medical school and residency programs were labeled large if they had >704 students or >15 residents, respectively.

RESULTS: A total of 1413 residents from 98 (89%) otolaryngology residency programs were included. Residents attending their home medical schools (18%) were equally distributed among regions (P = .845). Residents who attended medical schools in the same US regions (54%) were more likely from top-25 (P = .001) or private (P < .001) medical schools. Southern residents were most likely (64%) and Western residents were least likely (39%) from regional medical schools (P < .001), while residents from Midwest and Northeast had similar rates (54%-55%). The percentage of Midwest residents coming from regional medical schools has decreased from the 2013 to 2014 residency cycle (P = .037). Completi ng undergraduate school, medical school, and residency in the same region (38%) was also highest in the South (45%) and lowest in the West (25%) (P < .001). Residents at top-ranked residency programs were more likely from top-ranked (P < .001), large (P = .025), and private (P = .018) medical schools.

CONCLUSION: There exist significant associations between otolaryngology residents' medical school location, ranking, size, and funding source and their residency destination. More than half of the current otolaryngology residents attended medical school in the same geographic region, and about one-fifth have attended medical school and residency at the same institution. Future studies are warranted to evaluate how these results change as the match process evolves in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

PMID:34157902 | DOI:10.1177/00034894211026482

View on the web

What is the Evidence for Clinical Use of Advanced Technology in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Background

With an aim of improving prosthesis survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), use of computer-assisted technologies (CATs) such as robotics, has been on the rise to reduce intraoperative errors in surgical technique. In light of recent influx of CATs in the UKA, a review of these innovations will help providers to understand their clinical utility.

Method

A systematic literature search was performed following PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Among 19 studies comparing robotic UKA (rUKA) with conventional UKA, only 32% were randomized control trials, 47% reported minimum mean follow-up of 2 years, and 21% evaluated prosthesis survival. Similar results were obtained for navigation-assisted UKA and UKA performed with patient-specific instrumentation.

Conclusion

While CATs seem to reduce the surgical errors in UKA, the evidence on the efficacy of any of the studied CATs to improve survivorship remains limited and there are issues related to cost-effectiveness, learning curve, and increase in operating time.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on the web

Ranula in children: Retrospective study of 25 years and literature review of the plunging variable

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

1-s2.0-S0165587621002032-ga1.jpg

Publication date: Available online 23 June 2021

Source: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Author(s): Andressa Bolognesi Bachesk, Luiza Roberta Bin, Isabela Vessoni Iwaki, Liogi Iwaki Filho

View on the web

Prevalence and associated factors of respiratory allergies in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional investigation, September–December 2020

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader
Via Rhinitis

journal.pone.0253558.t006&size=inline

by Ahmad Almatroudi, Ayman M. Mousa, Divya Vinnakota, Adil Abalkhail, Ameen S. S. Alwashmi, Saleh A. Almatroodi, Fahad A. Alhumaydhi, Russell Kabir, Ilias Mahmud

Background

Prevalence of different respiratory allergies is increasing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Environmental risk factors of respiratory allergy vary regionally, hence the prevalence. This necessitates the needs for regional studies. This article reports prevalence and symptoms of respiratory allergies in the Qassim region, and the factors associated with the prevalence.

Methods

Eight hundred and fifty individuals aged ≥18 years and were living in the Qassim region filled up our structured online questionnaire between September and December 2020. We estimated the prevalence of different respiratory allergies with 95% confidence intervals. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of respiratory allergies.

Findings

The prevalence of any respiratory allergy in the Qassim region was 28.8%. Most families (58.1%) had at least one member with respiratory allergy. The prevalence of allergic rhinitis and bronch ial asthma were 13.5% and 11.2% 4.1% respectively. The reported symptoms included runny nose (13.6%), red, watery, and itchy eyes (10.4%), difficulty sleeping at night (10.2%), difficulty breathing in cold weather (9.2%), noisy breathing (8.5%), sneezing (8%), repeated coughing (7.5%) and shortness of breath (6.4%). Individuals with a family history were more likely to report any respiratory allergy (OR: 7.8), bronchial asthma (OR: 4.2) and allergic rhinitis (OR: 8.1) compared to the individuals without such family history. Odds of respiratory allergies was higher among males (OR: 1.5). Saudi nationals were less likely to report allergic rhinitis than the non-Saudis (OR: 0.4). Among those who reported a respiratory allergy, most (73.5%) received treatment and majority (61.7%) demonstrated compliance to the treatment, 8.8% needed hospitalization, and 23.1% needed emergency nebulization.

Conclusions

Prevalence reported in our study is different than that reported in other regio ns. Variability in the environmental exposures might explain this. We recommend a meta-analysis to estimate the national prevalence of respiratory allergies.

View on the web

Efficacy of Topical Epinephrine in Tympanoplasty

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Objectives/Hypothesis

To compare the hemostatic effects of commonly used concentrations of topical epinephrine in tympanoplasty.

Study Design

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Methods

Patients undergoing tympanoplasty were randomized to receive topical epinephrine at 1:1,000 or 1:10,000. With the investigators blinded, hemostasis was assessed with a modified Boezaart scale. Vasoconstriction was measured by laser Doppler. Blood pressure and pulse were tracked.

Results

Thirty patients, 4 to 84 years old, were studied, with 15 patients per group. Boezaart scores dropped a mean of 67% and 62% with 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, respectively (P = .44). Capillary blood flow decreased a mean of 50.4% and 50.9% with 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, respectively (P = .95). The mean change in heart rate and mean arterial pressure after topical epinephrine exposure were −4.9 and −0.73 beats per minute (P = .15), and −0.60 and −0.73 mmHg (P = .96) for 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 respectively. No adverse events occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Topical epinephrine at 1:10,000 has hemostatic efficacy comparable to 1:1,000 in tympanoplasty. Although both concentrations appear safe, use of topical epinephrine 1:10,000 should be considered over 1:1,000 to minimize the potential for adverse events.

Level of Evidence

2 Laryngoscope, 2021

View on the web

Maxillary Sinus Floor Infiltration: Results From a Series of 118 Maxillary Sinus Cancers

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Objectives/Hypothesis

Maxillary cancers are rare and aggressive tumors, which can spread beyond the sinus bony walls. Preoperative assessment of infiltration of maxillary sinus floor (MSF) is paramount for surgical planning, as palatomaxillary demolition significantly impacts patients' quality of life. This study investigates the challenges involved in the preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of MSF infiltration and analyzes its prognostic relevance.

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients treated for sinonasal malignancies at a single Institution was performed. Patients receiving surgical-based treatment with curative intent for primary maxillary sinus cancers, between January 2000 and November 2019, were included.

Results

A cohort of 118 patients was analyzed. By comparing intraoperative findings (endoscopic assessment and frozen sections) with preoperative radiological assessment, diagnostic changes with regard to MSF infiltration were found in 27.1% (32/118 cases). MSF infiltration negatively affected the prognosis in both univariate and multivariate analyses in the overall population. In the subgroup of pT1-T3 tumors, MSF infiltration was significantly associated with reduced overall (P = .012), disease-free (P = .011), and distant recurrence-free (P = .002) survival rates. Conversely, pT classification was not able to stratify patients according to prognosis, mainly because early-staged cancers (pT1-T2) with MSF infiltration showed reduced survival rates, similar to those observed in pT3 cancers.

Conclusions

Preoperative imaging should be integrated with intraoperative findings based on endoscopic inspection and frozen sections. Future studies are required to investigate the opportunity to incorporate MSF infiltration in the TNM staging system, considering its crucial role in defining the extent of surgery and its potential as prognosticator.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 2021

View on the web

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου