Comparison of retreatment ability of full-sequence reciprocating instrumentation and 360° rotary instrumentation

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the amount of root canal filling material after root canal filling removal with 360° rotary instrumentation or reciprocating motion with the same file sequence.

Materials and methods

Root canals of the 36 mandibular premolars were shaped with ProTaper Universal instruments up to size F2 and filled with corresponding single gutta-percha cone and sealer. The teeth were assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 18): group 1 360° rotational motion and group 2 reciprocating motion of ATR Tecnika motors (1310° clockwise and 578° counterclockwise). Retreatment procedure was performed with ProTaper Universal retreatment files with a sequence of D1-3 and ProTaper Universal F3 instruments. Total time required to remove filling material were recorded. Remaining filling material was examined under stereomicroscope at ×8 magnification. The data were analysed statistically using the Mann–Whitney U test, and testing was performed at 95 % confidence level (p < 0.05).

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05) in terms of remaining filling material. The total time required for retreatment was shorter in 360° rotational motion group compared to reciprocating motion group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Both continuous rotation and reciprocating motion showed similar effectiveness in terms of root canal filling material removal.

Clinical relevance

Using ProTaper Universal retreatment instruments with reciprocating motion of ATR motor and conventional rotary motion have similar efficacy in root canal filling removal.

from OroFacial Medicine via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1P5J6Mc
via IFTTT

from #Med Blogs by Alexandros G.Sfakianakis via paythelady61 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1QGqp1A
via IFTTT