Manipulating walking path configuration influences gait variability and six-minute walk test outcomes in older and younger adults

Publication date: February 2016
Source:Gait & Posture, Volume 44
Author(s): C.T. Barnett, M. Bisele, J.S. Jackman, T. Rayne, N.C. Moore, J.L. Spalding, P. Richardson, B. Plummer
This study determined whether manipulations to walking path configuration influenced six-minute walk test (6MWT) outcomes and assessed how gait variability changes over the duration of the 6MWT in different walking path configurations. Healthy older (ODR) and younger (YNG) (n=24) adults completed familiarisation trials and five randomly ordered experimental trials of the 6MWT with walking configurations of; 5, 10 and 15m straight lines, a 6m by 3m rectangle (RECT), and a figure of eight (FIG8). Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and walking speed (m.s−1) were recorded for all trials and the stride count recorded for experimental trials. Reflective markers were attached to the sacrum and feet with kinematic data recorded at 100Hz by a nine-camera motion capture system for 5m, 15m and FIG8 trials, in order to calculate variability in stride and step length, stride width, stride and step time and double limb support time. Walking speeds and 6MWD were greatest in the 15m and FIG8 experimental trials in both groups (p<0.01). Step length and stride width variability were consistent over the 6MWT duration but greater in the 5m trial vs. the 15m and FIG8 trials (p<0.05). Stride and step time and double limb support time variability all reduced between 10 and 30 strides (p<0.01). Stride and step time variability were greater in the 5m vs. 15m and FIG8 trials (p<0.01). Increasing uninterrupted gait and walking path length results in improved 6MWT outcomes and decreased gait variability in older and younger adults.

from #ORL-AlexandrosSfakianakis via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1PgBRvB
via IFTTT

from #Med Blogs by Alexandros G.Sfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1PgFx0c
via IFTTT