Publication date: April 2017
Source:Research in Developmental Disabilities, Volume 63
Author(s): Carl J. Dunst, Melinda Raab, Deborah W. Hamby
AimsThe purpose of the analyses described in this paper was to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of two different approaches to child response-contingent learning on rates of child learning and both concomitant and collateral child social–emotional behaviour.MethodThe participants were 71 children with significant developmental delays or multiple disabilities randomly assigned to either of the two contrasting approaches to interventions.ResultsFindings showed that an intervention which employed practices that built on existing child behaviour (asset-based practices) was more effective than an intervention focusing on teaching children missing skills (needs-based practices) for influencing changes in the rates of child learning as well as rates of child social–emotional behaviour mediated by differences in rates of child learning.ImplicationsBoth the theoretical and practical importance of the results are described in terms of the extended social–emotional benefits of asset-based response-contingent learning games.
Graphical abstract
http://ift.tt/2lTqkvG
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου