Dizziness, malpractice, and the otolaryngologist

Publication date: Available online 31 March 2017
Source:American Journal of Otolaryngology
Author(s): Anthony M. Tolisano, Sungjin A. Song, Douglas S. Ruhl, Philip D. Littlefield
PurposeTo assess malpractice claims related to the management of dizziness in otolaryngology in order to improve care and minimize the risk of litigation.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective review of the LexisNexis "Jury Verdicts and Settlements" database. All lawsuits and out of court adjudications related to the management of dizziness by otolaryngologists were collected. Data including patient demographics, plaintiff allegation, procedure performed, and indemnities were analyzed.ResultsOf 21 cases meeting inclusion criteria, 17 were decided by a trial jury and four were resolved out of court. Jury verdicts favored the plaintiff 53% of the time and a payout was made in 57% of cases overall. Average payments were higher for jury verdicts in favor of the plaintiff ($1.8 million) as compared to out of court settlements ($545,000). Two-thirds of cases involved surgery, most commonly stapes surgery. Legal allegations, including physical injury, negligence, and lack of informed consent failed to predict the legal outcome.ConclusionsAppropriate examination, testing, and referrals within a timely manner are crucial in the management of dizzy patients to avoid misdiagnoses. It is imperative that patients undergoing ear surgery are appropriately counseled that dizziness is a potential complication. The analysis of malpractice literature is complementary to clinical studies, with the potential to educate practitioners, improve patient care, and mitigate risk.



http://ift.tt/2nFAlOJ