Abstract
Introduction
Patients with microprolactinoma and idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia are not generally considered to be at risk of hypopituitarism and are therefore not routinely screened for this abnormality. In our clinical practice we have observed a number of patients with non-macroadenomatous hyperprolactinaemia to have anterior pituitary hormone deficits.
Aims
We aimed to establish the frequency and clinical significance of anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies, comparing patients with radiologically proven microprolactinomas and patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia.
Study Design
We retrospectively examined the casenotes of 206 patients with hyperprolactinaemia from our centre. Patients who did not fit the profile of surgically naïve microprolactinoma or idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia or who had incomplete data were excluded, resulting in a study group of 56 patients.
Results
35 patients with MRI evidence of microprolactinoma were identified, 3 (8.57%) of whom had one or more anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies. 21 patients with MRI negative idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia were identified, 9 (42%) of whom had one or more anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies (p<0.01). Only one patient in the MRI positive group had deficiency that required hormone replacement, in contrast 6 patients in the MRI negative group had deficiencies that were of clinical significance and which required hormone replacement.
Summary
This study shows a clinically significant incidence of anterior pituitary hormone deficiency in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia. The authors recommend that dynamic pituitary assessment should be considered routinely in this patient group. A prospective study would be required to assess the underlying cause for these abnormalities, as they suggest a non-tumour pan-pituitary process.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://ift.tt/2oupYvH
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου