The effects of different opacifiers on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins

Publication date: Available online 20 May 2017
Source:Dental Materials
Author(s): Karine Haas, Gulelala Azhar, Duncan J. Wood, Keyvan Moharamzadeh, Richard van Noort
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different opacifiers on the translucency of experimental dental composite-resins.MethodsThree metal oxides that are used as opacifiers were tested in this study: titanium oxide (TiO2), aluminium oxide (Al2O3) and zirconium oxide (ZrO2). Experimental composite-resins were fabricated containing 25wt.% urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based resin matrix and 75% total filler including different concentrations of metal oxides (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1wt.%) blended into silane treated barium-silicate filler. The specimens (15.5mm diameter and 1mm thickness) were light-cured and tested in the transmittance mode using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer at wavelengths from 380 to 700nm under a standard illuminant D65. The color differences (ΔE* ab) between different concentrations of opacifiers were also measured in transmittance mode based on their Lab values.ResultsStatistical analysis by ANOVA and Tukey's test showed a significant decrease (p<0.05) in light transmittance with the addition of opacifiers to the experimental composite-resins. There was a linear correlation between different concentrations of TiO2 and Al2O3 and total transmittance. Total transmittance was also found to be wavelength dependent. The color differences for the concentrations of 0–1wt.% of the opacifiers were above 1 ΔE* unit, with Al2O3 showing the smallest color shift.SignificanceThe type and the amount of the opacifiers used in this study had a significant effect on the translucency of the experimental UDMA-based dental composite resins. The most effective opacifier was TiO2, followed by ZrO2 and Al2O3 in decreasing order, respectively.



http://ift.tt/2rFd8xx