Abstract
Background
Digital pathology offers numerous advantages, allowing remote information sharing using whole slide imaging (WSI) to digitize an entire glass slide at high resolution, creating a digital slide.
Methods
In this study, we examine the concordance in diagnoses made on 40 digital slides (DS) versus traditional glass slides (GS) in differentiating between spongiotic dermatitis (SD) and patch/plaque-stage mycosis fungoides (MF).
Results
Greater interobserver concordance rate in final diagnosis of SD vs MF was observed with the utilization of DS (86.7%) compared to the utilization of GS (80%). Intraobserver concordance rate between the diagnoses rendered by a particular dermatopathologist on GS and DS was 86.7%. For all histopathological criteria, a correlation in the magnitudes of interobserver versus intraobserver discordances suggests that discordance between glass versus digital evaluation of these criteria may be largely expected subjective read variation independent of the media. Discordance in identification of histopathological features did not have a statistically significant link to discordance in diagnosis for 7 out of the 8 features.
Conclusions
The similarity between interobserver and intraobserver discordances suggests that WSI does not introduce additional barriers or variability to accurately identify histopathologic feature and to discriminate between MF and SD beyond interobserver variability.
http://ift.tt/2wwxBa9
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου