Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the present study was to determine the overall reliability and validity of arch parameters measured digitally compared to conventional measurement.

Methods

A sample of 111 plaster study models of Down syndrome (DS) patients were digitized using a blue light three-dimensional (3D) scanner. Digital and manual measurements of defined parameters were performed using Geomagic analysis software (Geomagic Studio 2014 software, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA) on digital models and with a digital calliper (Tuten, Germany) on plaster study models. Both measurements were repeated twice to validate the intraexaminer reliability based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using the independent t test and Pearson's correlation, respectively. The Bland–Altman method of analysis was used to evaluate the agreement of the measurement between the digital and plaster models.

Results

No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between the manual and digital methods when measuring the arch width, arch length, and space analysis. In addition, all parameters showed a significant correlation coefficient (r ≥ 0.972; p < 0.01) between all digital and manual measurements. Furthermore, a positive agreement between digital and manual measurements of the arch width (90–96%), arch length and space analysis (95–99%) were also distinguished using the Bland–Altman method.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that 3D blue light scanning and measurement software are able to precisely produce 3D digital model and measure arch width, arch length, and space analysis. The 3D digital model is valid to be used in various clinical applications.

http://ift.tt/2Aj2gJ4