Abstract
Objectives
The surveillance of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) according to the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) differs from the medico-legal criteria used to assess NIHL. Our study compares the two systems and proposes a novel method of simplifying the medico-legal criteria and applying it to ascertain noise-induced hearing loss.
Design
The anonymised audiograms of a group of 87 industrial workers from a single site were analysed with both methods.
Results
The comparison showed approximately one-third of the workers assessed in this study had their noise-induced hearing loss underestimated by the HSE criteria. The majority of these individuals were over 40 years of age.
Conclusions
The HSE criteria for noise-induced hearing loss needs review and re-alignment with the medico-legal criteria to address the discrepancy between the two systems.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://ift.tt/2yJnzrh
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου