Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Τετάρτη 6 Φεβρουαρίου 2019

Confirmatory Tests for the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Abstract

Objective

Saline infusion test (SIT), captopril challenge test (CCT), fludrocortisone suppression test (FST) and oral sodium loading test (SLT) are recommended by the Endocrine Society's clinical practice guidelines to diagnose primary aldosteronism, but which one is the best remains controversial. We aimed to summarize the available comparative data and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these four tests.

Design

We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published between January 1980 and January 2018.

Patients

Eligible studies reported on the accuracy of one or more of the four confirmatory tests in patients suspected of PA.

Measurements

Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction of all selected studies, which consisted of study characteristics and data to estimate the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and the corresponding summary area under the curve (SAUC), pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

We identified 26 articles including 3686 patients. 15 articles evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CCT, 10 of SIT, 1 of FST, and none of SLT. For CCT, the SAUC was 0.9207, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95%CI 0.84‐0.89) and 0.84 (95%CI 0.81‐0.86), respectively. For SIT, the SAUC was 0.9232, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95%CI 0.82‐0.87) and 0.87 (95%CI 0.85‐0.89), respectively. For FST, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95%CI 0.66‐0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI 0.82‐0.99), respectively. Overall, we found no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy of CCT and SIT.

Conclusions

CCT and SIT exhibit high and comparable accuracy for diagnosing PA. CCT may be a more feasible alternative as it is safe and much easier to perform.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.



http://bit.ly/2t9U8cq

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου