Yes. Yes but.

Yes. Yes absolutely. Yes but.

Yes I agree with every bit of this argument, and have in fact made it myself, (1986) over (1989) and over (2006) again.1–4 I can even argue that it is worse, yet more damaging than the author says, that knowledge of fetal sex damages pregnancy in some fundamental ways. So yes, yes, yes, it would have been a far better thing had these technologies never been invented.

But. They are. The train has left the station, the ship has sailed, the genie is out of the bottle and the fetus is out of the pregnancy.

That perhaps is one of the reasons this technology is more dangerous than originally thought or even than the author, focusing on the consequences of sex selection itself, can discuss here. A sexed fetus is a named fetus, a baby in all but the birth….

from #Medicine-SfakianakisAlexandros via o.lakala70 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Qfvk4W
via IFTTT

from #Med Blogs by Alexandros G.Sfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1mgxAkd
via IFTTT