A Comprehensive Analysis on the Association between Tobacco-Free Betel Quid and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer in Taiwanese Men.
PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164937
Authors: Wu YH, Yen CJ, Hsiao JR, Ou CY, Huang JS, Wong TY, Tsai ST, Huang CC, Lee WT, Chen KC, Fang SY, Wu JL, Hsueh WT, Lin FC, Yang MW, Chang JY, Liao HC, Wu SY, Lin CL, Wang YH, Weng YL, Yang HC, Chen YS, Chang JS
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although betel quid (BQ) is an established risk factor of head and neck cancer (HNC), insufficiencies exist in the literature regarding the dose-response, BQ types, HNC sites, and BQ cessation. The current study was conducted to fill these insufficiencies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital-based case-control study was conducted to evaluate the association between BQ and HNC. In-person interview was conducted to collect data on BQ chewing. The current analysis included 487 men newly diagnosed with HNC and 617 male controls who were frequency-matched to the cases by age. The association between BQ and HNC was assessed using multivariable unconditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: Ever BQ chewing was associated with an increased HNC risk regardless of the BQ types. A non-linear positive association between BQ and HNC was observed, with a steep rise in HNC risk for the first 5 pack-years or 200,000 minutes of BQ consumption. Every year of BQ cessation was associated with a 2.9% reduction in HNC risk; however, the risk did not reduce to the level of non-BQ chewers even after 20 years of BQ cessation. Eliminating BQ chewing may prevent 51.6% of HNCs, 62.6% of oral cancers, and 41.3% of pharyngeal cancers in Taiwan.
CONCLUSION: Our results supported the positive association between BQ and HNC. BQ cessation is effective in reducing HNC risk and should be encouraged. Because BQ cessation may not reduce the HNC risk to the level of non-BQ chewers, it is important to prevent the initiation of BQ chewing.
PMID: 27780233 [PubMed - in process]
http://ift.tt/2dJn011
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου