Nutritional Status of Rural Older Adults Is Linked to Physical and Emotional Health

Publication date: Available online 6 March 2017
Source:Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Author(s): Seung Eun Jung, Alex J. Bishop, Minjung Kim, Janice Hermann, Giyeon Kim, Jeannine Lawrence
BackgroundAlthough nutritional status is influenced by multidimensional aspects encompassing physical and emotional well-being, there is limited research on this complex relationship.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the interplay between indicators of physical health (perceived health status and self-care capacity) and emotional well-being (depressive affect and loneliness) on rural older adults' nutritional status.DesignThe cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1, 2007, to June 1, 2008.Participants/settingA total of 171 community-dwelling older adults, aged 65 years and older, residing within nonmetro rural communities in the United States participated in this study.Main outcome measuresParticipants completed validated instruments measuring self-care capacity, perceived health status, loneliness, depressive affect, and nutritional status.Statistical analyses performedStructural equation modeling was employed to investigate the complex interplay of physical and emotional health status with nutritional status among rural older adults. The χ² test, comparative fit index, root mean square error of approximation, and standardized root mean square residual were used to assess model fit.ResultsThe χ² test and the other model fit indexes showed the hypothesized structural equation model provided a good fit to the data (χ² (2)=2.15; P=0.34; comparative fit index=1.00; root mean square error of approximation=0.02; and standardized root mean square residual=0.03). Self-care capacity was significantly related with depressive affect (γ=–0.11; P=0.03), whereas self-care capacity was not significantly related with loneliness. Perceived health status had a significant negative relationship with both loneliness (γ=–0.16; P=0.03) and depressive affect (γ=–0.22; P=0.03). Although loneliness showed no significant direct relationship with nutritional status, it showed a significant direct relationship with depressive affect (β=.4; P<0.01). Finally, the results demonstrated that depressive affect had a significant negative relationship with nutritional status (β=–.30; P<0.01). The results indicated physical health and emotional indicators have significant multidimensional associations with nutritional status among rural older adults.ConclusionsThe present study provides insights into the importance of addressing both physical and emotional well-being together to reduce potential effects of poor emotional well-being on nutritional status, particularly among rural older adults with impaired physical health and self-care capacity.



http://ift.tt/2lUAo6B