Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Κυριακή 9 Απριλίου 2017

Characterization of the effect of a new commercial transmission detector on radiotherapy beams

Publication date: Available online 9 April 2017
Source:Practical Radiation Oncology
Author(s): Joey P. Cheung, Angelica Perez-Andujar, Olivier Morin
PurposeTo evaluate the influence of a new commercial transmission detector on radiotherapy beams.Methods and MaterialsA transmission detector designed for online treatment monitoring was characterized on a TrueBeam STx linear accelerator with 6MV, 6FFF, 10MV, and 10FFF beams. Measurements of PDDs, inplane and crossplane off-axis profiles at different depths, transmission factors, and skin dose were acquired with 3x3cm2, 5x5cm2, 10x10cm2, 20x20cm2, and 40x40cm2 field sizes at 100 cm and 80 cm SSD. A CC04 chamber was used for all profile and transmission factor measurements. Skin dose was assessed at 100 cm, 90 cm, and 80 cm SSD using a variety of detectors (Roos and Markus parallel-plate chambers, and OSLD). Skin dose was also assessed for various patient sample plans with OSLDs.ResultsThe PDDs showed small differences between the unperturbed and perturbed beams for 100 cm SSD (≤4 mm dmax difference, <1.2% average profile difference) for all field sizes. At 80 cm SSD, the differences were larger (≤8 mm dmax difference, <3% average profile difference). The differences were larger for the flattened beams and larger field sizes. The off-axis profiles showed similar trends. Field penumbras looked similar with and without the transmission detector. Comparisons in the profile central 80% showed a maximum average (maximum) profile difference between all field sizes of 1.0% (2.6%) and 1.4% (6.3%) for 100 cm and 80 cm SSD, respectively. The average measured skin dose increase at 100 cm (80 cm) SSD for 10x10cm2 field size was <4% (<35%) for all energies. For 40x40cm2 field size, this increased to <31% (≤63%). For the sample patient plans, the average skin dose difference was 0.53% (range−6.6% to 10.4%).ConclusionsThe transmission detector has minimal effect on clinically relevant radiotherapy beams for IMRT and VMAT (field sizes 10x10cm2 and less). For larger field sizes, some perturbations are observable which would need to be assessed for clinical impact.



http://ift.tt/2oozNiC

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου