Source:The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Author(s): Raaj K. Ruparel, Torrey A. Laack, Rushin D. Brahmbhatt, Phillip G. Rowse, Johnathon M. Aho, Yazan N. AlJamal, Brian D. Kim, David S. Morris, David R. Farley, Ronna L. Campbell
BackgroundQuality-improvement efforts at our institution have identified chest tube dislodgement as a preventable complication of tube thoracostomy. Because proper fixation techniques are not well described in the literature and are seldom formally taught, techniques vary among residents.ObjectiveOur aim was to develop and test a framework for teaching and assessing chest tube securement.MethodsA repeated-measures study design was used. At baseline, 19 emergency medicine residents (program years 1–3) placed and secured a chest tube in a cadaver. After a 45-min proficiency-based teaching session using a low-cost chest tube simulator (approximate cost, $5), each resident again placed and secured a chest tube in a cadaver, followed by 3-month retention testing. All securements were evaluated by two raters using a four-point checklist and a five-point global assessment scale (GAS). The checklist addressed suture selection, tying knots down to the tube, wound approximation, and tube displacement relative to skin.ResultsAfter the initial educational intervention, median scores for the group improved significantly over baseline for the GAS (p < 0.001), checklist (p < 0.001), and amount of displacement (p = 0.01). At 3 months, GAS, checklist, and displacement scores did not differ significantly from the immediate post-test scores. Inter-rater reliability was substantial, with weighted κ values of .77 for the GAS and .70 for the checklist.ConclusionsQuality of chest tube securement by emergency medicine residents can be significantly improved with an inexpensive chest tube simulator and a brief workshop. The four-point checklist served as a reliable and effective means for teaching and assessing chest tube securement.
http://ift.tt/2p3ZnqL
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου