The Best Single Measurement for Assessing Splenomegaly in Patients with Cirrhotic Liver Morphology

Publication date: Available online 8 August 2017
Source:Academic Radiology
Author(s): Zachary Nuffer, Thomas Marini, Andrey Rupasov, Stephen Kwak, Shweta Bhatt
Rationale and ObjectivesThere is little agreement within the radiology literature as to the best single measurement for assessing splenomegaly. In this study, we evaluate the correlation of multiple unidirectional measurements of the spleen with splenic volume in patients with cirrhotic liver morphology on computed tomography (CT).Materials and MethodsSplenic volume was retrospectively calculated from CT examinations of 179 adult patients, 47 of whom were approved as renal donors, and 132 of whom were referred for various other indications, and were found to have cirrhotic liver morphology on CT. Seven unidimensional measurements (long-axis, cranial-caudal, width, and four measures of thickness) of each spleen were evaluated to identify which most closely correlated with the calculated volume.ResultsThe splenic width had the best correlation with splenic volume for mild-to-moderate splenomegaly, and the splenic cranial-caudal measurement had the best correlation with splenic volume for massive splenomegaly. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrates that a splenic width measurement of approximately 10.5 cm has a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 78% for mild-to-moderate splenomegaly, and a cranial-caudal measurement of 14.6 cm has a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 91% for massive splenomegaly.ConclusionsA splenic width threshold of 10.5 cm is the most sensitive (89%) and specific (78%) single measurement for mild-to-moderate splenomegaly in patients with cirrhotic liver morphology, whereas a cranial-caudal height threshold of 14.6 cm is the most sensitive (92%) and specific (91%) single measurement for massive splenomegaly.



http://ift.tt/2umt4ty