Σφακιανάκης Αλέξανδρος
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5 Άγιος Νικόλαος
Κρήτη 72100
00302841026182
00306932607174
alsfakia@gmail.com

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader

Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου

Τρίτη 9 Ιανουαρίου 2018

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Role of Radiosurgery and Radiation Therapy in the Management of Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Role of Radiosurgery and Radiation Therapy in the Management of Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas.

Neurosurgery. 2017 Dec 20;:

Authors: Germano IM, Sheehan J, Parish J, Atkins T, Asher A, Hadjipanayis CG, Burri SH, Green S, Olson JJ

Abstract
Question: What are the indications for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment vs observation for patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas without evidence of radiographic progression?
Recommendation: Level 3: If tinnitus is not observed at presentation, it is recommended that intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas and small tumors (<2 cm) without tinnitus be observed as observation does not have a negative impact on tumor growth or hearing preservation compared to treatment.
Question: Is there a difference in outcome based on radiosurgery equipment used: Gamma Knife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) vs linear accelerator-based radiosurgery vs proton beam?
Recommendation: There are no studies that compare 2 or all 3 modalities. Thus, recommendations on outcome based on modality cannot be made.
Question: Is there a difference in outcome based on the dose delivered?
Recommendation: Level 3: As there is no difference in radiographic control using different doses, it is recommended that for single fraction SRS doses, <13 Gy be used to facilitate hearing preservation and minimize new onset or worsening of preexisting cranial nerve deficits.
Question: Is there a difference in outcome based on the number of fractions?
Recommendation: As there is no difference in radiographic control and clinical outcome using single or multiple fractions, no recommendations can be given.
Question: What is the best time sequence for follow-up images after SRS?
Recommendation: Level 3: Follow-up imaging should be obtained at intervals after SRS based on clinical indications, a patient's personal circumstances, or institutional protocols. Long-term follow-up with serial magnetic resonance imagings to evaluate for recurrence is recommended. No recommendations can be given regarding the interval of these studies.
Question: Is there a role for retreatment?
Recommendation: Level 3: When there has been progression of tumor after SRS, SRS can be safely and effectively performed as a retreatment.
Question: What is the risk of radiation-induced malignant transformation of vestibular schwannomas treated with SRS?
Recommendation: Level 3: Patients should be informed that there is minimal risk of malignant transformation of vestibular schwannomas after SRS.
Question: What are the indications for SRS in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2?
Recommendation: Level 3: Radiosurgery is a treatment option for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 whose vestibular schwannomas are enlarging and/or causing hearing loss.  The full guideline can be found at: http://ift.tt/2CUuZsQ.

PMID: 29309637 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



http://ift.tt/2m8aMFw

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου