Scatter Correction of Septal Penetration for 123I-IMP Cerebral Blood Flow SPECT Adding Radioactivity from the Outside of Field of View-Comparison between Simulation-based and Multi-window Scatter Corrections.

Related Articles

Scatter Correction of Septal Penetration for 123I-IMP Cerebral Blood Flow SPECT Adding Radioactivity from the Outside of Field of View-Comparison between Simulation-based and Multi-window Scatter Corrections.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2017;73(10):1028-1038

Authors: Yamanaga T, Katayama Y, Nakama S, Kakimi A, Nagahata T, Kishimoto K, Ichida T, Higashiyama S, Kawabe J, Shiomi S

Abstract
PURPOSE: The N-Isopropyl-p-[123I] Iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP) SPECT imaging reduces the image quality and quantitative accuracy due to scatter and septal penetration occurred by radioactive uptake from outside of the field of view such as the lungs. We evaluated the influence of scatter and septal penetration using phantom-simulated radioactivity from outside of the field of view, and subsequently compared the effect of scatter and septal penetration corrections between the simulation-based effective scatter source estimation (ESSE) method and the multi-window method (ellipse approximation method).
METHODS: We used the phantom filled with 10 and 25 kBq/mL for the brain and lung parts corresponding to radioactive concentration in the clinical study. The SPECT images were acquired with and without lung phantom using low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) and cardiac high-resolution (CHR) collimators. We quantitatively evaluated a brain phantom by count analysis and coefficient of variation as reference data without lung phantom simulated the radioactivity from outside of the field of view, and compared between two scatter corrections by each collimator.
RESULTS: The brain count in cerebral base with the ESSE method using LEHR collimator was higher than that of the ellipse approximation method. The whole brain count with the ellipse approximation method using CHR collimator shows 28.8% lower than the ESSE method, so that it suggests that the ellipse approximation method for LEHR collimator and the ESSE method for CHR collimator was close to reference counts. The coefficient of variation of the ESSE method was lower than that of the ellipse approximation method for both two collimators.
CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to correct the scatter and penetration from outside the field of view with high accuracy, by using the ellipse approximation method with LEHR collimator and the ESSE method with CHR collimator.

PMID: 29057774 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://ift.tt/2DBSe89