Laparoscopic Versus Open Transverse Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Related Articles

Laparoscopic Versus Open Transverse Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World J Surg. 2018 Mar 09;:

Authors: Gavriilidis P, Katsanos K

Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The survival benefits, oncological adequacy, effectiveness, and safety of laparoscopic transverse colectomy (LTC) were compared with that of open transverse colectomy (OTC) using a meta-analysis.
METHODS: EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane library, and Google scholar databases were searched for the last 20 years. Meta-analyses were performed using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the inverse variance hazard ratio method.
RESULTS: No survival benefits were detected between the two LTC and OTC cohorts. OTC showed shorter operative time by 38 min compared to LTC [mean difference (MD) = 38(15.23-60.77), p = 0.001]. However, LTC was associated with earlier postoperative recovery. The time to flatus and time to oral intake for LTC were MD = -1.12(-1.68 to -0.55, p = 0.001) and MD = -1.57(-2.38 to -0.76, p = 0.001), respectively. In addition, LTC was associated with a shorter hospital stay by 4.5 days [MD = -4.64(-7.52 to -1.75), p = 0.002].
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to OTC, LTC provides similar survival benefits, earlier postoperative recovery, and shorter hospital stay by 4.5 days.

PMID: 29523909 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://ift.tt/2FAHaJv