Related Articles |
Needle biopsy of routine thyroid nodules should be performed using a capillary action technique with 24-27 gauge needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thyroid. 2018 May 10;:
Authors: Moss W, Finegersh A, Pang J, Califano JA, Coffey CS, Orosco R, Brumund KT
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fine needle biopsy is the international standard for diagnostic evaluation of thyroid nodules. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal fine needle biopsy technique. The implementation of capillary action versus aspiration and the optimal needle gauge remain topics of debate.
METHODS: A systematic review of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles evaluating the effects of capillary action vs. aspiration and needle gauge on success rates of fine needle biopsy of the thyroid were assessed for inclusion. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of non-diagnostic cytopathology.
RESULTS: Twenty-four articles with a collective 4,428 nodules were ultimately included in the review. Twenty articles evaluated capillary action vs. aspiration and six evaluated needle gauge. All but two studies were prospective, most of which were blinded trials with or without randomization. Using a random effects model, capillary action was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the relative risk of non-diagnostic cytopathology {RR 0.57, 95% CI (0.34, 0.92), p = 0.02}. There was a non-significant trend in favor of smaller needle gauges.
CONCLUSION: Given the statistically significant deceased rate of non-diagnostic cytopathology with capillary action and the potential for increased pain and complications with larger needles without a proven benefit, fine needle biopsy of routine thyroid nodules should be performed without aspiration and with smaller needle gauges (24-27G).
PMID: 29742978 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
https://ift.tt/2Kb0Llu
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου