Perspectives of Sunless‐Only Tanning Business Owners

Abstract

To date, 16 states in the US restrict minors from using tanning beds.¹ The principal argument against policy restricting indoor tanning is the concern it would harm small businesses.^2‐4 One counterargument is that tanning businesses could stay financially viable by offering UV‐free sunless tanning services (e.g., spray or airbrush tanning) which would serve customers' desire for a tan while not exposing them to the risks associated with ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Sunless only tanning businesses are already in existence and owners may provide insights on this alternative business model.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

https://ift.tt/2FMWmHP