Comparison of Conventional Syringe, CanalBrush, EndoActivator, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, and Manual Instrumentation in Removing Orange-Brown Precipitate: An In Vitro Study.

Related Articles

Comparison of Conventional Syringe, CanalBrush, EndoActivator, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, and Manual Instrumentation in Removing Orange-Brown Precipitate: An In Vitro Study.

Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Feb 10;:

Authors: Guneser MB, Dincer AN, Arslan D

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the various techniques for removing precipitate formed after irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX).
BACKGROUND DATA: It is still unclear whether different irrigant activation systems can effectively remove precipitate that is firmly attached to the root canal walls.
METHODS: Eighty-two extracted single-rooted human teeth were instrumented by using the ProTaper rotary system. The roots were irrigated with 5% NaOCl and then 2% CHX to form orange-brown precipitate on the root canal walls. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally, and the amount of precipitate on the canal walls was measured under a stereomicroscope at 15 × magnification before the root halves were reassembled. Then, conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), CanalBrush (CB), EndoActivator (EA) system, photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and manual instrumentation (MI) techniques were used to remove the precipitate, during which 5 mL of distilled water was used for 1 min. The amount of precipitate remaining on the canal walls was measured, and the percentage of precipitate removed was calculated. Data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p = 0.05).
RESULTS: All experimental groups contained residual precipitate. The precipitate was more effectively removed in the MI group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The CB and EA groups showed better removal than the CSI and PIPS groups (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in removal between these latter two groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: None of the techniques used was able to completely remove the orange-brown precipitate from the root canal surfaces.

PMID: 28186862 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://ift.tt/2kjZJq0