Efficacy and toxicity profiles of two chemoradiotherapies for stage II laryngeal cancer - a comparison between late course accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAHF) and conventional fractionation (CF).

Related Articles

Efficacy and toxicity profiles of two chemoradiotherapies for stage II laryngeal cancer - a comparison between late course accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAHF) and conventional fractionation (CF).

Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Mar 16;:1-5

Authors: Okazaki E, Matsushita N, Tashiro M, Shimatani Y, Ishii K, Hosono M, Oishi M, Teranishi Y, Iguchi H, Miki Y

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment results of late course accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAHF) compared with conventional fractionation (CF) for stage II laryngeal cancer.
METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients treated for stage II laryngeal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two patients underwent LCAHF, twice-daily fractions during the latter half with a total dose of 69 Gy. Twenty-seven patients received CF of 70 Gy.
RESULTS: The local control rates (LCRs), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5 years were 80.6%, 74.0%, and 90.4%, respectively, after LCAHF and 64.7%, 68.2%, and 90.5%, respectively, after CF. There were no significant differences in LCR, OS, and DSS (p = .11, 0.68, and 0.69, respectively). In a small number of patients with supraglottic cancer, LCAHF was associated with a significantly higher LCR at 5 years compared with CF (100% vs. 41.7%; p = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that compared the results of LCAHF and CF for stage II laryngeal cancer. We could not find significant differences in LCR, DSS, and OS rates between LCAHF and CF groups. Although in a small number of patients with supraglottic cancer, LCAHF may improve the LCR compared with CF.

PMID: 28301268 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://ift.tt/2nzZ3iT