Mandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes

Abstract

The single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative for edentulous patients who are poorly adapted to their dentures due to low retention and stability of the conventional mandibular complete denture (CD). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of SIMO, which can be measured by examining patient perception of treatment effects. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the comparative results of CD and SIMO treatments by using patient-reported outcome measures. A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The search included studies published up to July 2017. The focus question was: "Do single-implant mandibular overdentures improve patient-reported outcomes compared to conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients?" Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials (RCT) and prospective studies. After initial screening for eligibility and full-text analysis, 11 studies were included for data extraction and quality assessment (five parallel-group RCTs, two crossover RCTs, and four prospective studies). All studies reported marked improvement in satisfaction with the dentures and quality-of-life measures after SIMO treatment, irrespective of variations in implant-treatment protocols and retention systems. Methodological considerations revealed a lack of evidence from RCTs on the comparative effectiveness of the two treatment strategies. Hence, although available evidence suggests considerable improvement in patient-reported outcomes following the insertion of a single implant to retain a mandibular denture, further well-designed comparative studies between SIMO and CD are required to improve the level of evidence and to support the indication of SIMO treatment in routine practice.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

http://ift.tt/2wWCJDV