Can clinicopathological parameters predict for lymph node metastases in ypT0-2 rectal carcinoma? Results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 and CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase 3 trials

Publication date: Available online 18 June 2018
Source:Radiotherapy and Oncology
Author(s): Jens Müller von den Grün, Arndt Hartmann, Rainer Fietkau, Michael Ghadimi, Torsten Liersch, Werner Hohenberger, Jürgen Weitz, Rolf Sauer, Christian Wittekind, Philipp Ströbel, Claus Rödel, Emmanouil Fokas
BackgroundThe advent of less radical surgical approaches has generated concern about leaving locoregional lymph node metastases (LNM) unresected that could lead to adverse outcome. We examined the prognostic role of clinicopathological factors for ypN-positivity in patients with ypT0-2 rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 and CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase 3 trials.MethodsThe correlation of clinicopathological factors with ypN-status (ypN0 vs ypN1/2) was examined in n = 776 patients with ypT0-2 rectal carcinoma after preoperative CRT and total mesorectal excision surgery using Pearson's Chi-squared test for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis' test for continuous variables. Multivariable analysis was performed using binary logistic regression to identify independent prognosticators for ypN-positivity.ResultsResidual LNM (ypN+) were found in 6%, 20.8% and 21.4% of patients with ypT0, ypT1 and ypT2 carcinomas, respectively. Independent prognosticators for LNM were advanced ypT category (p = 0.002) and lymphatic invasion (p = 0.020). In a separate multivariable analysis performed upon exclusion of ypT-category due to multicollinearity with residual tumor diameter (RTD), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.015) and RTD ≥10 mm (p = 0.005) demonstrated strong correlation with LNM.ConclusionAdvanced ypT-stage, lymphatic invasion and RTD ≥10 mm were prognostic factors for LNM in patients ypT0-2 rectal carcinoma treated with CRT and surgery within both phase 3 trials. The high incidence of LNM in the ypT1-2 group needs to be taken into consideration in the context of oncological safety and indicate that LE should be advocated with great caution in this patient subgroup. The prognostic pathological factor identified here could help guide decision of LE vs TME after standard CRT.



https://ift.tt/2tqSh2N