Publication date: September 2018
Source: Oral Oncology, Volume 84
Author(s): Jared Weiss, Jill Gilbert, Allison Mary Deal, Mark Weissler, Chris Hilliard, Bhishamjit Chera, Barbara Murphy, Trevor Hackman, Jay Justin Liao, Juneko Grilley Olson, David Neil Hayes
Abstract
Background
Although induction studies of TPF in SCCHN have not improved outcomes compared to chemoradiotherapy alone, phase II studies of weekly carboplatin (CbP), paclitaxel and cetuximab (C225) have shown promising results. Nano-albumin-paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) based chemotherapy has demonstrated a higher response rate (RR) than solvent-based paclitaxel in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with favorable toxicity.
Materials and methods
Patients with treatment naïve SCCHN of any site with ≥N2b disease or that was unresectable by strict criteria were eligible. Patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2, CbP area under the curve (AUC) 2 and C225 400 mg/m2 week 1 then 250 mg/m2 for six weeks, followed by standard of care chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The primary endpoint was clinical response rate to induction therapy as defined by RECIST version 1.1. Secondary measures included toxicity, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life as measured by FACT-HN.
Results
38 eligible subjects were treated. Primary sites were: oropharynx (OPX) (25), larynx (3) oral cavity (OC) (9), hypopharynx (1). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity during induction was acneiform rash (26%) followed by neutropenia (16%). RR was 76.3%. Median PFS and OS have not been reached (median follow-up of 3.3 years); they were superior in patients with response.
Conclusions
The combination of nab-paclitaxel, CbP and C225 is feasible, tolerable and active against locally advanced SCCHN.
https://ift.tt/2MnaB8C
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου