Abstract
Background
Asthma‐chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS), which has received much attention, has not been unanimously defined.
Objective
In this study, we tried to demonstrate that longitudinally defined ACOS is more useful in the real‐world than blending patients with asthma and COPD.
Methods
The study patients had undergone two consecutive pulmonary function tests measured at least 3 months apart (n = 1,889). We selected the patients who had positive bronchodilator response or methacholine provocation tests (n = 959). Next, we defined ACOS as a patient with a persistent airflow obstruction [forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1)/forced vital capacity < 0.7] that was identified twice consecutively by an interval of at least 3 months (n = 228).
Results
The proportions of patients who were older, male, and smokers were significantly higher, and baseline lung function was lower in patients with ACOS. In the longitudinal analysis, the mean change in lung function was high, and a greater decline in FEV1 was observed in patients with ACOS. In addition, we compared ACOS and severe asthma, and we also performed a cluster analysis and compared the results with our definition of ACOS. According to our definition, ACOS is an independent subtype with distinctive characteristics. Finally, a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) was performed to identify genetic variations associated with ACOS, but no significant single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that ACOS should be defined longitudinally and considered as an independent subgroup distinguished by inherited environmental factors rather than as a genetically distinct independent group.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://bit.ly/2QWwJow
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου